When you claim that our God is bigger than their God, and that our killing is righteous, while theirs is evil, we have begun to resemble the enemy we claim to be fighting, and that is immoral.

When you tell people that you intend to run and govern as a "compassionate conservative," using the word which is the essence of all religious faith - compassion, and then show no compassion for anyone who disagrees with you, and no patience with those who cry to you for help, you are doing something immoral. When you talk about Jesus constantly, who was a healer of the sick, but do nothing to make sure that anyone who is sick can go to see a doctor, even if she doesn't have a penny in her pocket, while promoting policies that increase prescription drug company profits, you are doing something immoral.

When you put judges on the bench who are known to be racist, and will set civil rights back a hundred years, and when you surround yourself with preachers who say gays or Presidents of sovereign nations ought to be killed, you are doing something immoral.

When the Vietnam war was raging we knew that that war was wrong, and you know that this war is wrong

During the Bush Administration's war in Iraq, more than 2.2 million internally displaced Iraqis, 2.5 million Iraqi refugees, and 1, 200,000.. 60% women and children. and 4,100 U.S. soldiers are dead. 35,000 wounded troops, 200, 000 missing weapons and 500 billion wasted dollars..

Bush lied when he FIRST quoted 30,000, a number not supported by any known data.

Bush considers an execution a reason for a party. In Texas he had execution parties until a reporter attended the party he had for Karla Faye Tuckers Execution, and his execution “jokes” were reported in the press.

Bush is a killer of men, women and children. He seems to enjoy killing as President, the same as he did as Governor in Texas.

Here is what just 1,000 looks like. Each one someone's, mother, father, brother, sister, son or daughter. Now imagine 100, or 200 or 300 OR 1000 of these and then see if you can still use the term "acceptable collateral losses" without wincing .

xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx

In May 2003, President Bush landed on an aircraft carrier in a flight suit, stood under a banner proclaiming "Mission Accomplished," and triumphantly announced that major combat operations were over in Iraq. Asked if he had any regrets about the stunt, Bush said he would do it all over again. Three years and thousands more dead and he still says “we are winning.” “Winning” what?

How do you know that 9/11 was a Muslim terrorist plot? How do you know that three World Trade Center buildings collapsed because two were hit by airliners? You only “know” because the government gave you the explanation of what you saw on TV. (Did you even know that three WTC buildings collapsed?)

On 9/11 three of them fell, and fell perfectly straight down. Why do you think demolition experts spend weeks planting charges and timing the explosions with millisecond precision? To make sure the buildings implode and fall straight down, just as the three WTC towers did. That perfection does not happen by accident. Bush had the rubble quickly shipped to China to be melted, even though it is illegal to destroy rubble from an engineering failure or a crime scene. You have to investigate precisely what caused the failures so that you can build safer buildings in future.
Some readers will write to me to say that they saw a TV documentary or read a magazine article verifying the government’s explanation of 9/11. But, of course, these Americans did not check the facts either--and neither did the people who made the documentary and wrote the magazine article.

Scientists and engineers, such as Clemson University Professor of Engineering Dr. Judy Woods and BYU Professor of Physics Dr. Steven Jones, have raised compelling questions about the official account of the collapse of the three WTC buildings. The basic problem for the government's account is that the buildings are known to have fallen at free fall speed, a fact that is inconsistent with the government's "pancaking" theory in which debris from above collapsed the floors below. If the buildings actually "pancaked," then each floor below would have offered resistance to the floors above, and the elapsed time would have been much longer. These experts have also calculated that the buildings did not have sufficient gravitational energy to accommodate the government's theory of the collapse. It is certainly a known and non-controversial fact among physicists and engineers that the only way buildings can collapse at free fall speed into their own footprints is by engineered demolition. Explosives are used to remove the support of floors below before the debris from above arrives. Otherwise, resistance is encountered and the time required for fall increases. Engineered demolition also explains the symmetrical collapse of the buildings into their own foot prints. As it is otherwise improbable for every point in floors below to weaken uniformly, "pancaking" would result in asymmetrical collapse as some elements of the floor would give sooner than others.

Scientific evidence is a tough thing for the American public to handle, and the government knows it. The government can rely on people dismissing things that they cannot understand as "conspiracy theory." But if you are inclined to try to make up your own mind, you can find Dr. Jones' and Dr. Woods’ papers, which have been formally presented to their peers at scientific meetings, on line at http://www.st911.org/

Experts have also pointed out that the buildings' massive steel skeletons comprised a massive heat sink that wicked away the heat from the limited, short-lived fires, thus preventing a heat buildup. Experts also point out that the short-lived, scattered, low-intensity fires could barely reach half the melting point of steel even if they burned all day instead of merely an hour. The official story explained the following: The jet fuel of the planes hitting the WTC set fire to the building and generated enough heat (2000 F) to melt the steel trusses and core columns to cause them to buckle and fail this caused the towers to collapse.

Ok. I do need for you to ponder on this. Jet fuel or Jet-A (http://www.csgnetwork.com/jetfuel.html) is a kerosene based fuel that "flash burns" meaning that once it ignites it converts into a gas and burns off very quickly. It does not continuously burn like solid materials burn since the liquid depletes a source very quickly unlike solids. This is why the fire balls that exploded when the planes impacted only lasted a few seconds. The only way jet A continues to burn with an output is when it is continually fed with a fuel source and along with that there must be a continual source of oxygen to keep it burning efficiently. I want someone to explain how this hydrocarbon based fuel was able to produce enough sustained heat to cause a vertical rectangular column of steel that is nearly 3-4 inches thick (core column) to loose its strength and fail in less than an hour? How is this able to penetrate the column in less than an hour and not dissipate heat energy like a heat sink to the connecting members?

We need to think about what is called speed and symmetry.. The towers fell at a rate close to free fall.. free fall would be about 10 seconds.. the towers went down in twelve seconds.. this is the speed.. All this occurred at the rate of +/-10 floors a second. It would take roughly 6 tenths of a second for a floor to be pulverized.
The entire building was destroyed at this level in 10-12 seconds First we should realize that this is exactly what would be needed for a successful demolition, second we need to realize that EXTRA energy is required to make this happen. Why do we need extra energy? the answer is because of what is known as Newton's third law. According to Newton, whenever objects A and B interact with each other, they exert forces upon each other. When you sit in your chair, your body exerts a downward force on the chair and the chair exerts an upward force on your body. There are two forces resulting from this interaction - a force on the chair and a force on your body. These two forces are called action and reaction forces and are the subject of Newton's third law of motion. Formally stated, Newton's third law is: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object. The direction of the force on the first object is opposite to the direction of the force on the second object. Forces always come in pairs - equal and opposite action-reaction force pairs. If the floors were being destroyed at a rate of 10 floors a second the area mass of falling building would have depleted itself of mass in less than 2 seconds. Since they are of the same composition they must have the same ability to loose their integrity equally. Since the majority of mass was being ejected out (this started as soon as it made contact with each other) what was left to cause the collapse to continue?

Size of this mass is irrelevant in this equation because they are equal when making contact.

In physics energy can only be transferred when a change occurs. In this case, If potential energy is converted into Kinetic energy but then converted again into the energy to pulverize the concrete and eject it out, how is the mass able to maintain it's kinetic energy? This goes against the laws of physics. Kinetic energy is slowed down by dissipative forces and that is exactly what should have taken place. The 18 floors should have depleted and the collapse should have slowed and halted.

Because, mass is the property of an object which determines its resistance to changes in velocity. Velocity is the speed of an object in a given direction. Velocity is a vector quantity. A Vector is a quantity having both magnitude and direction..

Displacement is the difference between an initial position and a final one. Displacement is also a vector quantity.

Work is defined as the application of force over some displacement. Numerically the work done is the product of the force and the distance moved in the direction of that force. This may be calculated as force times displacement times the cosine of the angle between force and displacement. The angle gets involved because things do not always move in the direction in which you push them. Why? because very seldom are all forces balanced and equal!

So how it is possible for all the core columns (47 or so, give or take if some were damaged) were able to all fail simultaneously to cause the tower to fall vertically and symmetrically. This is an impossible feat without having the heat energy to be precise enough to cause the steel members to fail in the exact pattern at the exact time.

What this simply means is that with a big bite taken out of one side of the building the mass must fall to that side. Moreover, the videos show that the collapses in that portion were not straight down: in fact the lower left corner is 4 or more stories ahead of the right. This must be explained in detail and, like every other significant point, with the mechanism that changed the fall to straight down.

Fire and fatigue cannot explain in detail how such local failures could lead to sudden and complete failure of all core columns.

How is it possible that the Potential energy of the 18 floors of structure above the collapse point when it became kinetic energy was able to destroy 92 or so stories of building in less than 12 seconds? If the 18 stories of building was crashing into the floors below and was able to convert it's kinetic energy into the energy to destroy all the joints of the core columns and pulverize the concrete into fine dust and eject it out in all directions hundreds of feet away from the footprint area of the building. How is it possible that the collapse was able to continue once it depleted itself of mass? Consider these facts:

All the concrete was pulverized into dust

All the core columns were shattered at their joints

All the Corrugated sheets along with the trusses and office contents was pulverized on every floor.

All the windows were shattered into fine particles almost to the point of silica

All this occurred at the rate of +/-10 floors a second. It would take roughly 6 tenths of a second for a floor to be pulverized.

The entire building was destroyed at this level in 10-12 seconds.

Physics challenge: Calculate the energy levels necessary to do the described above and whether or not the kind of mass structure provided would be able to do this and be able to overcome the dissipative forces (resistance) of the mass below without the use of any other catalyst?

Again, how is it possible for these 18 floors to to destroy 92 floors without the 18 floors depleting themselves of material? If the floors were being destroyed at a rate of 10 floors a second the area mass of falling building would have depleted itself of mass in less than 2 seconds. Since they are of the same composition they must have the same ability to loose their integrity equally. Since the majority of mass was being ejected out (this started as soon as it made contact with each other) what was left to cause the collapse to continue?

Perpetual motion cannot be applied here because with perpetual motion, no energy is wasted. With the WTC all of the energy was wasted because the concrete was pulverized and energy was wasted ejecting it out. Energy was also wasted shattering the joints of the huge steel core column members and energy was wasted in the basement levels where pools of molten steel were found (meaning that kinetic energy would have had to be converted into heat energy) In reality however due to dissipative forces the kinetic energy would have depleted far sooner before it got this far down. This is just to illustrate that perpetual motion is not applicable.

The same dynamics applies to the WTC 2 and the WTC 7 that collapsed that day as well.

Is it impossible to prove a falsehood ? The official story certainly has proven nothing. I want you to ponder on just this.. not whether it was a missile or government. Ponder on these hard core facts of physics and take it from there. This is pure physics.

The following 2 paragraphs are from Mathematica's web site about their software.

Significance arithmetic is the arithmetic of approximate numerical quantities that not only keeps track of numerical results, but also uses error propagation to track their accuracy. In this way, numerical computations can carry accuracy and precision information with them, returning in the end a numerical quantity together with its estimated (or worst-case) uncertainty. Significance arithmetic is an extremely powerful technique that offers many advantages over fixed precision (most commonly, floating-point or integer arithmetic), and is implemented in high-end mathematical software such as Mathematica...

Every function in Mathematica is implemented as completely as possible, handling the widest range of numeric and symbolic inputs. Mathematica knows how to evaluate functions to any precision anywhere in the complex plane. Along with supporting numerical inputs, Mathematica supports the world's largest collection of symbolic transformation rules, allowing sophisticated manipulation and reduction of formulas....

Why this is important is because it can be used to prove conclusively and simply by its application to the task that the central columns could not loss their physical integrity in any other scenario besides an application of extra energy to the physical structural equation.

You see at this point it becomes the violation of physical laws as fundamental as the conservation of matter and energy. And at this point it can be proven mathematically.

As you know; That tall buildings fall ''over'' is accepted as the physical law of increased disorder known as the second law of thermodynamics.

And as you know Newton's third law of motion '''for every action their is an equal and opposite reaction'', is absolute proof of a structured mass' ability to resist a fall at a uniform rate without variation from free fall. And this of course shows the pancake theory can not explain the speed and symmetry that was actually observed and caught on tape.

And finally you know the amount of pulverized dust although unexplained in the official story can be seen as a mathematical function of the amount of energy required to turn that much order into that much disorder..

The amount of energy required to expand the North Tower's dust cloud was many times the entire potential energy of the tower's elevated mass due to gravity. The over 10-fold disparity between the most conservative estimate and the gravitational energy is not dismissed as reflecting uncertainties in quantitative assessments.

Computer simulations can compile and run 'all' the data backward and show the mass energy relation cannot be explained by any other scenario that an applied amount of extra energy; The equations just won't work otherwise. And of course is proof of a violation of physical laws.

To claim this much energy came from the top stories falling on the bottom stories is then shown to be physically impossible. Which can now be shown mathematically because we do not have to know the exact amount of energy, we only need to know the equation can never balance. Further we can estimate how much energy we are talking about by using historical building and materials data. So we can apply basic structural equations to a statistical method using modern computing technology and will find in every case that the resisting mass is far greater then a 'failure of fatigue' can account for in the catastrophe. There is a lot of unaccounted for extra energy, every time, and a complete dissolution of the mass integrity.

Also, heat generated is an indicator able to quantify the data. And show for example that neither fire gutted buildings nor structural collapse has ever generated pools of molten metal..

Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University reported to the Deseret Morning News and later revealed on the Alex Jones Radio Show that through imperical research he has come to discover that the World Trade Center towers could not have possibly collapsed due to the impact of the jets that hit the buildings on September 11th. While this news may not seem particularly shocking to many in the 9-11 Truth Movement, Jones’ testimony is representative of the growing list of many prominent Americans that have gone public in recent time exposing the systematic cover-up of 9-11.

According to Professor Jones, all of the laws of science and mathematics point directly to the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center and not to fire bringing down the three towers.

Through his intensive and methodical research, Jones has come to realize that the speed and symmetry of the collapse of the WTC buildings prove that the so-called official story must be false. He points to venting or squibs (smoke puffs) present around the collapsing structures as being direct indicators of the use of pre-positioned explosives. He also noted that the way that NASA infrared satellites and aircraft were able to take photos of the burning wreckage and molten steel for weeks was indicative of a massive use of thermite in the structure.

For Jones, the real problem with the official line on 9/11 is that it relies on wrong-headed science that starts with a conclusion and seeks out evidence that supports that theory to the exclusion of all others in order to cover up what really happened on September 11th. FEMA, the 9/11 Commission, and even the National Institute of Standards and Technology had all started with the supposition that what caused the WTC collapses was the impact of the jets and their exploding fuel and ignored any and all evidence to the contrary even though their findings were “highly unlikely.”

These observations were not analyzed by FEMA, NIST nor the 9/11 Commission, he says.

• With non-explosive-caused collapse there would typically be a piling up of shattering concrete. But most of the material in the towers was converted to flour-like powder while the buildings were falling, he says. "How can we understand this strange behavior, without explosives? Remarkable, amazing — and demanding scrutiny since the U.S. government-funded reports failed to analyze this phenomenon."

• Steel supports were "partly evaporated," but it would require temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel — and neither office materials nor diesel fuel can generate temperatures that hot. Fires caused by jet fuel from the hijacked planes lasted at most a few minutes, and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in any given location, he says.

• Molten metal found in the debris of the World Trade Center may have been the result of a high-temperature reaction of a commonly used explosive such as thermite, he says. Buildings not felled by explosives "have insufficient directed energy to result in melting of large quantities of metal," Jones says.

• Multiple loud explosions in rapid sequence were reported by numerous observers in and near the towers, and these explosions occurred far below the region where the planes struck, he says.

No third party was ever called on to examine ground zero and Jones lamented the government’s decision to so quickly ban any investigation of the crime scene and to haul all of the wreckage away to China before it could be examined by any third party investigators. Many like Jones are now coming forward with skepticism this such as fire engineering which went public that the WTC was a crime scene and shouldn’t have been hauled away and that fire could not possibly make towers collapse.

He also described the findings of Underwriter’s Lab and Kevin Ryan who used complex models in the testing of the collapse and revealed that it was impossible for the jet-fuel and fire alone to cause any of the three buildings to collapse

Now Jones, who is head of research in fusion and solar energy at BYU, is calling for an independent, scientific investigation that would focus on the physics of the WTC collapse and not be guided by political constraints and efforts to limit the findings to the “official story” that the buildings collapsed because a hijacked plane was crashed into them.

Physics Professor Steven Jones of BYU held up a pebble sized chunk with a plastic gloved hand. He explained how he had obtained samples of once molten metal from three different sites of the World Trade Center wreckage.

Two characteristics of the samples he found interesting; No aluminum and the presence of sulfur. No aluminum we expected.
The presence of sulfur was the real find. Steel does not contain sulfur, How did the sulfur get there? Jones asked.

Then he explained that when you add sulfur to Thermite it becomes Thermate. Thermate is a patented product used in cutter charges by demolition companies to slice through steel like a hot knife through butter.

We now have in our hot little hands not only eye whiteness testimony after testimony that there were multiple explosions prior to the collapse of each tower, hour upon hour of video footage of free fall speed

pyroclastic flow producing complete demolitions of WTC 1,2 &7, study upon study and paper upon paper explaining how controlled demolition is the only possible explanation of why all three buildings fell the way they fell, we have PHYSICAL EVIDENCE of Thermate use.

Ask yourself when in your entire life you have ever witnessed a collapse like this without demolitions. When you saw the WTC collapse for the first time, you thought it looked just like a demolition didn't you? Your first impression was right!

THE TOP 40

REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001

... An outline in simple talking points ...

8/3/07 NOTE: We are presently compiling the best documentation links for every single point on this page, and intend to post the updated version by September 1, 2007.
Version of May 22, 2006: This overview is in development. If you use the search function with key words, you will discover that 911Truth.org is home to articles backing virtually every point made below. Much of the basic research is available at the Complete 9/11 Timeline (hosted by cooperativeresearch.org), the 9/11 Reading Room (911readingroom.org), and the Spitzer petition and complaint (Justicefor911.org). For physical evidence discussion, see Point 7.

THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY

1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.

2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?

3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?

4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?

5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?

THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS

6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?

7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives? (See "The Case for Demolitions," the websites wtc7.net and 911research.wtc7.net, and the influential article by physicist Steven Jones. See also items no. 16 and 24, below.)

FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS

8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the "Big Wedding"), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.
b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.
c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.

9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers
a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military''s "Able Danger" program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.
b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another a coincidence.

10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration''s order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O''Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)

11) Insider Trading
a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally - including but not limited to "put options" placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London.
b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks.
c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange).

12) Who were the perpetrators?
a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the "magic passport" of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11.
b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had "doubles," all of which is omitted from official investigations.
c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)? http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-worldtrade-50suspects,0,1825231.story

THE 9/11 COVER-UP, 2001-2006

13) Who Is Osama Bin Ladin?
a. Who judges which of the many conflicting and dubious statements and videos attributed to Osama Bin Ladin are genuine, and which are fake? The most important Osama Bin Ladin video (Nov. 2001), in which he supposedly confesses to masterminding 9/11, appears to be a fake. In any event, the State Department''s translation of it is fraudulent.
b. Did Osama Bin Ladin visit Dubai and meet a CIA agent in July 2001 (Le Figaro)? Was he receiving dyalisis in a Pakistani military hospital on the night of September 10, 2001 (CBS)?
c. Whether by Bush or Clinton: Why is Osama always allowed to escape?
d. The terror network associated with Osama, known as the "data base" (al-Qaeda), originated in the CIA-sponsored 1980s anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan. When did this network stop serving as an asset to covert operations by US intelligence and allied agencies? What were its operatives doing in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya in the years prior to 9/11?

14) All the Signs of a Systematic 9/11 Cover-up
a. Airplane black boxes were found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were "disappeared" and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report.
b. US officials consistently suppressed and destroyed evidence (like the tapes recorded by air traffic controllers who handled the New York flights).
c. Whistleblowers (like Sibel Edmonds and Anthony Shaffer) were intimidated, gagged and sanctioned, sending a clear signal to others who might be thinking about speaking out.
d. Officials who "failed" (like Myers and Eberhard, as well as Frasca, Maltbie and Bowman of the FBI) were given promotions.

15) Poisoning New York
The White House deliberately pressured the EPA into giving false public assurances that the toxic air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe. This knowingly contributed to an as-yet unknown number of health cases and fatalities, and demonstrates that the administration does consider the lives of American citizens to be expendable on behalf of certain interests.

16) Disposing of the Crime Scene
The rapid and illegal scrapping of the WTC ruins at Ground Zero disposed of almost all of the structural steel indispensable to any investigation of the collapse mechanics. (See also item no. 23, below.)

17) Anthrax
Mailings of weapons-grade anthrax - which caused a practical suspension of the 9/11 investigations - were traced back to US military stock. Soon after the attacks began in October 2001, the FBI approved the destruction of the original samples of the Ames strain, disposing of perhaps the most important evidence in identifying the source of the pathogens used in the mailings. Were the anthrax attacks timed to coincide with the Afghanistan invasion? Why were the letters sent only to media figures and to the leaders of the opposition in the Senate (who had just raised objections to the USA PATRIOT Act)?

18) The Stonewall
a. Colin Powell promised a "white paper" from the State Department to establish the authorship of the attacks by al-Qaeda. This was never forthcoming, and was instead replaced by a paper from Tony Blair, which presented only circumstantial evidence, with very few points actually relating to September 11th.
b. Bush and Cheney pressured the (freshly-anthraxed) leadership of the Congressional opposition into delaying the 9/11 investigation for months. The administration fought against the creation of an independent investigation for more than a year.
c. The White House thereupon attempted to appoint Henry Kissinger as the chief investigator, and acted to underfund and obstruct the 9/11 Commission.

19) A Record of Official Lies
a. "No one could have imagined planes into buildings" - a transparent falsehood upheld repeatedly by Rice, Rumsfeld and Bush.
b. "Iraq was connected to 9/11" - The most "outrageous conspiracy theory" of all, with the most disastrous impact.

20) Pakistani Connection - Congressional Connection
a. The Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, creator of the Taliban and close ally to both the CIA and "al-Qaeda," allegedly wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just prior to September 11th, reportedly through the ISI asset Omar Saeed Sheikh (later arrested for the killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was investigating ISI connections to "al-Qaeda.")
b. This was ignored by the congressional 9/11 investigation, although the senator and congressman who ran the probe (Bob Graham and Porter Goss) were meeting with the ISI chief, Mahmud Ahmed, on Capitol Hill on the morning of September 11th.
c. About 25 percent of the report of the Congressional Joint Inquiry was redacted, including long passages regarding how the attack (or the network allegedly behind it) was financed. Graham later said foreign allies were involved in financing the alleged terror network, but that this would only come out in 30 years.

21) Unanswered Questions and the "Final Fraud" of the 9/11 Commission:
a. The September 11th families who fought for and gained an independent investigation (the 9/11 Commission) posed 400-plus questions, which the 9/11 Commission adopted as its roadmap. The vast majority of these questions were completely ignored in the Commission hearings and the final report.
b. The membership and staff of the 9/11 Commission displayed awesome conflicts of interest. The families called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration member and close associate of "star witness" Condoleezza Rice, and were snubbed. Commission member Max Cleland resigned, condemning the entire exercise as a "scam" and "whitewash."
c.The 9/11 Commission Report is notable mainly for its obvious omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods - ignoring anything incompatible with the official story, banishing the issues to footnotes, and even dismissing the still-unresolved question of who financed 9/11 as being "of little practical significance."

22) Crown Witnesses Held at Undisclosed Locations
The alleged masterminds of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) and Ramzi Binalshibh, are reported to have been captured in 2002 and 2003, although one Pakistani newspaper said KSM was killed in an attempted capture. They have been held at undisclosed locations and their supposed testimonies, as provided in transcript form by the government, form much of the basis for The 9/11 Commission Report (although the Commission''s request to see them in person was denied). After holding them for years, why doesn''t the government produce these men and put them to trial?

23) Spitzer Redux
a. Eliot Spitzer, attorney general of New York State, snubbed pleas by New York citizens to open 9/11 as a criminal case (Justicefor911.org).
b. Spitzer also refused to allow his employee, former 9/11 Commission staff member Dietrich Snell, to testify to the Congress about his (Snell''s) role in keeping "Able Danger" entirely out of The 9/11 Commission Report.

24) NIST Omissions
After the destruction of the WTC structural steel, the official Twin Towers collapse investigation was left with almost no forensic evidence, and thus could only provide dubious computer models of ultimately unprovable hypotheses. It failed to even test for the possibility of explosives. (Why not clear this up?)

25) Radio Silence
The 9/11 Commission and NIST both allowed the continuing cover-up of how Motorola''s faulty radios, purchased by the Giuliani administration, caused firefighter deaths at the WTC - once again showing the expendability, even of the first responders.

26) The Legal Catch-22
a. Hush Money - Accepting victims'' compensation barred September 11th families from pursuing discovery through litigation.
b. Judge Hallerstein - Those who refused compensation to pursue litigation and discovery had their cases consolidated under the same judge (and as a rule dismissed).

27) Saudi Connections
a. The 9/11 investigations made light of the "Bin Ladin Airlift" during the no-fly period, and ignored the long-standing Bush family business ties to the Bin Ladin family fortune. (A company in which both families held interests, the Carlyle Group, was holding its annual meeting on September 11th, with George Bush Sr., James Baker, and two brothers of Osama Bin Ladin in attendance.)
b. The issue of Ptech.

28) Media Blackout of Prominent Doubters
The official story has been questioned and many of the above points were raised by members of the US Congress, retired high-ranking officers of the US military, the three leading third-party candidates for President in the 2004 election, a member of the 9/11 Commission who resigned in protest, a former high-ranking adviser to the George W. Bush administration, former ministers to the German, British and Canadian governments, the commander-in-chief of the Russian air force, 100 luminaries who signed the "9/11 Truth Statement," and the presidents of Iran and Venezuela. Not all of these people agree fully with each other, but all would normally be considered newsworthy. Why has the corporate-owned US mass media remained silent about these statements, granting due coverage only to the comments of actor Charlie Sheen?

GEOPOLITICS, TIMING AND POSSIBLE MOTIVES

29) "The Great Game"
The Afghanistan invasion was ready for Bush''s go-ahead on September 9, 2001, with US and UK force deployments to the region already in place or underway. This followed the failure earlier that year of backdoor diplomacy with the Taliban (including payments of $125 million in US government aid to Afghanistan), in an attempt to secure a unity government for that country as a prerequisite to a Central Asian pipeline deal.

30) The Need for a "New Pearl Harbor"
Principals in US foreign policy under the current Bush administration (including Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle and others) have been instrumental in developing long-running plans for worldwide military hegemony, including an invasion of the Middle East, dating back to the Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations. They reiterated these plans in the late 1990s as members of the "Project for a New American Century," and stated a clear intent to invade Iraq for the purpose of "regime change." After 9/11, they lost no time in their attempt to tie Iraq to the attacks.

31) Perpetual "War on Terror"
9/11 is supposed to provide carte-blanche for an open-ended, global and perpetual "War on Terror," against any enemy, foreign or domestic, that the executive branch chooses to designate, and regardless of whether evidence exists to actually connect these enemies to 9/11.

32) Attacking the Constitution
a. The USA PATRIOT Act was written before 9/11, Homeland Security and the "Shadow Government" were developed long before 9/11, and plans for rounding up dissidents as a means for suppressing civil disturbance have been in the works for decades.
b. 9/11 was used as the pretext to create a new, extra-constitutional executive authority to declare anyone an "enemy combatant" (including American citizens), to detain persons indefinitely without habeas corpus, and to "render" such persons to secret prisons where torture is practiced.

33) Legal Trillions
9/11 triggers a predictable shift of public spending to war, and boosts public and private spending in the "new" New Economy of "Homeland Security," biometrics, universal surveillance, prisons, civil defense, secured enclaves, security, etc.

34) Plundered Trillions?
On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced a "war on waste" after an internal audit found that the Pentagon was "missing" 2.3 trillion dollars in unaccounted assets. On September 11th, this was as good as forgotten.

35) Did 9/11 prevent a stock market crash?
Did anyone benefit from the destruction of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices at WTC 7, and the resultant crippling of hundreds of fraud investigations?

36) Resource Wars
a. What was discussed in the Energy Task Force meetings under Dick Cheney in 2001? Why is the documentation of these meetings still being suppressed?
b. Is Peak Oil a motive for 9/11 as inside job?

37) The "Little Game"
Why was the WTC privatized just before its destruction?

HISTORY

38) "Al-CIA-da?"
The longstanding relationship between US intelligence networks and radical Islamists, including the network surrounding Osama Bin Ladin. (See also point 13d.)

39) Historical Precedents for "Synthetic Terror"
a. In the past many states, including the US government, have sponsored attacks on their own people, fabricated the "cause for war," created (and armed) their own enemies of convenience, and sacrificed their own citizens for "reasons of state."
b. Was 9/11 an update of the Pentagon-approved "Project Northwoods" plan for conducting self-inflicted, false-flag terror attacks in the United States, and blaming them on a foreign enemy?

40) Secret Government
a. The record of criminality and sponsorship of coups around the world by the covert networks based within the US intelligence complex.
b. Specifically also: The evidence of crime by Bush administration principals and their associates, from October Surprise to Iran-Contra and the S&L plunder to PNAC, Enron/Halliburton and beyond.

REASON NUMBER 41:
RELATED MOVEMENTS AND PARALLEL ISSUES

Use of depleted uranium and its multi-generational consequences on human health and the environment.

Longstanding development of contingency plans for civil disturbance and military rule in the USA (See, "The War at Home")

Whether you call it "Globalization" or "The New World Order" - An unsustainable system of permanent growth ultimately requires warfare, fraud, and mass manipulation.

GOING FORWARD ...

"But an inside job would involve thousands of people! How could they keep a secret?" Counter-arguments, red herrings, speculations and false information.

Selected essays, books and websites that make the case for 9/11 as inside job. (See Resources)

Demanding a real investigation of the September crimes - Not just a patriotic duty, but a matter of survival.

Can you imagine being afraid to leave your home because of the very real threat of attack--whether by bomb or bullet or stone? This is a fear, a threat, Iraqi women have to live with every single day.

In April 2006, CODEPINK released Iraqi Women Under Siege, a detailed report on the status of Iraqi women. In it, we describe the serious deterioration of women's rights since the U.S. invasion. We explore how the high level of violence in Iraq has constrained women's lives and limited their options, leaving them and their families to grapple with the traumatic impact of war both physically and psychologically.

We also produced a video based on our sponsorship of a tour of Iraqi women to the United States, Women Say NO to War: Iraqi and American Women Speak Out. You can order it here.

Unfortunately, since we produced these materials, the situation of Iraqi women has gotten dramatically worse. A recent Reuters article documents how sectarian violence is forcing Iraqi women from their jobs and into arranged marriages. We receive heartbreaking letters from our friends in Iraq on a regular basis. Here is an excerpt from one we received a week ago:

Unfortunately, security is almost impossible to come by for Iraqi women. In the Kurdish north, the part of the country insulated from most of the violence, the situation of women has reached new lows. Du'a Khalil Aswad, a 17 year old from the town of Bashiqa, in Iraqi Kurdistan, was stoned to death on April 7, 2007. She came from a family of Yazidi faith, and was snatched from her home by Yazidi men who had discovered that she was in love with a Muslim Arab man and had visited him. In front of hundreds of people, including local police, they dragged her to the center of town and stoned her to death. Townspeople watched and even filmed this barbaric act. You can see a portion of the tape here (viewer discretion is STRONGLY advised). The killers, obviously well known in the community, are still free.

(CNN) -- Yanar Mohammed left the comfort of her Toronto, Canada, home to return to Iraq and fight for a cause she says is overlooked in her native country -- women's rights.

"The upper hand was given to the Islamists and to the tribals," Mohammed said of the formation of Iraq's young democracy. "Nobody listened to us," she said in a recent CNN interview. "To the tribals, to the Islamists, but never to women."

In 2003, Mohammed founded the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq, in order to give voice to and seek protection for those women in Iraq who are in need.

"Nobody has the right to tell us that we are second-rate citizens," Mohammed said.

Historically, Iraqi women have enjoyed more freedoms than the women of neighboring countries, according to Human Rights Watch. Under Saddam Hussein's secular Baathist party, citizens were declared equal before the law regardless of sex, blood, language, social origin, or religion, and they were allowed to vote and run for office, the HRW said.

Even after Hussein rolled back women's rights to curry favor with tribal and religious leaders after the first Gulf War, women were spared the level of violence they endure now, according to Amnesty International.

According to a United Nations report, the kidnapping, rape and murder of women is on the rise. Honor killings, or the killing of a woman who brought perceived dishonor to her family, is up also. Women -- Muslims and non-Muslims alike -- are warned to adhere to the strict dress code, the United Nations said.

"You go to the Baghdad morgue, and you find a big number of women who are headless; they have been beheaded, they have been tortured and killed, and this is usually the case in honor killing," Mohammed said. "Nobody can speak about democracy if women are being killed for honor." She added that the current laws in Iraq do not punish the men who carry out honor killings.

And so, Mohammed and her organization are fighting not for equity in wages or reproductive rights, but for freedoms that women in other nations take for granted: The right to not be bought and sold, to not be raped and to not be murdered, to not to have to wear a veil.

"We see over the television hundreds of officials who say that they have given freedoms to women," Mohammed said. "But you look at the streets -- every single woman is veiled, she is veiled in white, in black, in colors; she cannot move freely she cannot go to her education, cannot go to work."

Mohammed said the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq has been able to prevent the honor killing of more than 30 women and has helped usher some women out of Iraq.

But she says that Iraq's current laws hinder their efforts.

"Our only hope is to create a youth movement ... to change the world to a better one," she said.

Informational Meeting on Microchipping Animals under the Animal Welfare Act
USDA Center at Riverdale
4700 River Road
Riverdale, MD 20737
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Note: $2.25 parking fee. The machine takes quarters, one and five dollar bills. Please remember to take the token which is needed to exit the parking lot.
Agenda
8:00 AM - 8:30 AM Sign in/Registration
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM Welcoming comments by APHIS
8:45 AM- 10:00 AM Oral comments (time for each speaker determined by the
number of persons who register to speak.) 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM BREAK
10:15 AM - 12:00 PM Open Dialogue / Questions and Answers
If Needed:
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM Lunch on your own
1:00 PM - 2:30 PM Oral Comments or open dialogue as needed
Questions for consideration:
1. What are the advantages and disadvantages to using an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard microchip for pet identification?
2. Should Animal Care mandate the ISO standard when microchips are used to identify animals under the Animal Welfare Act?
3. How can microchip databases be linked for ready access by emergency personnel, animal control officers, or other authorities?
4. What is the most effective way to harmonize multiple microchip technologies?
5. What are the costs and benefits for using an ISO standard microchip - based on industry as well as individual impacts?
6. Should Animal Care mandate the ISO standard when microchips are used to identify animals under the Animal Welfare Act?
7. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the use of microchips in large mammals (e.g. elephants, lions, tigers)?

STUDENT MEAL TRACKING SYSTEM

This year the food service department will implement a new meal tracking system entitled "biometric fingerprint reading for meal tracker point of service... students register for thier daily meals by placing a finger on a scanner.. the system is capable of storing and sharing information..

Revelation 13:16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4360800110742625275&q=occult+nazis

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3797889292300937848

The occult and the Nazis.. it is documentary and worth watching

"Their" New World Order (The Whore of Babylon)

IF YOU WATCH THESE VIDEOS, YOU WILL UNDERSTAND WHY THE WORLD WILL FALL INTO WW3.. WHO THE PARASITES BEHIND IT ALL ARE.. AND HOW THE PROPHECIES ARE BEING FULFILLED....SO BE WISE AND SEEK SANCTUARY EARLY..
THE GREED GAME AND THE MONEY CHANGERS.. In a depression wealth doesn't simply vanish. It is the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer!. It is redistributed from the poor and working class to the wealthy banksters who buy up you life's work for pennies on the dollar then declare the recession over and sell it back to your for a thousand percent profit. ....... The Bush economy.!! "If I Were a Terrorist"

War by other means.. dont believe the lie that the rich feed the poor through aid, the truth is the poor always feed the rich..

.. The death of Habeas Corpus..The writ of habeas corpus has historically been an important instrument for the safeguarding of individual freedom against arbitrary state action. attempt to pardon the war crimes of the administration and those who went against the Geneva Convention Call for the immediate resignation of President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney .. FREEDOM TO FASCISM.. .. IRAQ FOR SALE...This war is profit-driven. It is a money making operation.. It results in billions of dollar of profits for Wall Street, the oil giants and the military industrial complex, .. this is how the white house has supported the troops.. Winter soldier Mike Prysner testimony.... “What did you do in the war, daddy?” It’s a question the next generation could ask all of us who stood by as our government invaded Iraq to start a war whose purpose and rationale keep shifting and whose end is nowhere in sight,

american troops going insane..

Iraq-Children of Abu Ghraib - tortured & used as hostages
This is how Bush gave freedom and Democracy to Iraqi Girls .... 6 year old Iraqi girls forced into prostitution by Bushs WAR
.

. THE OIL CONSPIRACY... the 12 trillion dollar heist

the cartel..

the monetary exchange.. WHO AND WHAT IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE?... ""We have in the Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve"".. .. .. .. SECRETS OF THE CIA .. 911 REVISITED.. .. .. TRUTH VERSES LIES.. .. .. SS agents and authorities across America are targeting people who discuss the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights and accusing them of engaging in political terrorism. ..

IS THERE MEDIA COMPLIANCE?..

'Propaganda Analysis' researchers, found that Bill O’Reilly employs at least six of the seven main propaganda devices nearly 13 times in all his editorials.... His Zionist owner, Rupert Murdoch (Religious Jews are opposed to Zionism) of 'Fox News' has admitted to manipulating the news concerning the war with Iraq.... .. .. .. A WAR OF TERROR.. .. .. THE ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER.. The New World Order feeds on human poverty and the destruction of the natural environment. It generates social apartheid, encourages racism and ethnic strife, undermines the rights of women and often precipitates countries into destructive confrontations between nationalities. Since the 1990s, it has extended its grip to all major regions of the World.. .. .. ROOTS OF THE FOURTH RIECH AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER.. Fascism demands a succession of wars, foreign conquests, and national threats to keep the nation in a state of fear, anxiety and patriotic hypertension. Those who disagree are branded ideological traitors." .. .. THE VERICHIP.. MARK OF DOOM....... George Bush's name is equal to 666 if we use the Hebrew letter equivalents................... On 6-6-6:Bush Announces Mark of The Beast System..............Coincidence?? SO NOW YOU KNOW... WHAT WILL YOU DO?

THE TOP 40

Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception

"Their" New World Order (The Whore of Babylon)

Information Warfare:
Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception