
iblically; The Holy
Spirit, 'Spirit of God's wisdom', is our Holy and Divine Mother.
Our souls in communion are the Holy Church; Bride of Christ, Daughter
of Zion.
Virgin Mother Mary and Mary Magdalene personify a female Holy Spirit
and the Bride of Christ.
hat evidence does the
Bible yield about the reality of daily life for women deep in Biblical
antiquity?
Because the Bible speaks with authority to many millions of people the
answers to these questions about women and their authority as
Christians have great impact. Are there hints in the Bible of stories
and traditions about women and their ministries that have been lost to
us? What part did Jewish women have in the movement that grew up
around Jesus of Nazareth? Is there evidence of a Divine Feminine in
the Bible? If so, removing Her from the liturgy is not a victimless
crime. Why is it that a woman can be seen as a Saint, a Doctor of the
Church, or even an Apostle but is still denied the priesthood?
The Bible abounds in male imagery and language. For centuries
interpreters have explored and exploited this male language to
articulate theology; to shape the contours and content of the church,
synagogue and academy; and to
instinct human beings -- female and male -- in who they are, what
roles they should play, and how they should behave. So harmonious has
seemed this association of Scripture with sexism, of faith with
culture, that only a few have even questioned it.
However, some commentators observed the plight of the female in
Israel. Less desirable in the eyes of her parents than a male child, a
girl stayed close to her mother, but her father controlled her life
until he relinquished her to another man for marriage. If either of
these male authorities permitted her to be mistreated, even abused,
she had to submit without recourse. Thus, Lot offered his daughters to
the men of Sodom to protect a male guest (Gen. 19:8); Jephthah
sacrificed his daughter to remain faithful to a foolish vow (Judg.
11:29-40); Amnon raped his half-sister Tamar (II Sam. 13); and the
Levite from the hill country of Ephraim participated with other males
to bring about the betrayal, rape, murder and dismemberment of his own
concubine (Judg. 19). Although not every story involving female and
male is so terrifying, the narrative literature nevertheless makes
clear that from birth to death the Hebrew woman belonged to men. What
such narratives show, the legal corpus amplifies. Defined as the
property of men (Exod. 20:17; Deut. 5:21), women did not control their
own bodies. A man expected to marry a virgin, though his own virginity
need not be intact. A wife guilty of earlier fornication violated the
honor and power of both her father and husband. Death by stoning was
the penalty (Deut. 22:13-21). Moreover, a woman had no right to
divorce (Deut. 24:1-4) and, most often, no right to own property.
Excluded from the priesthood, she was considered far more unclean than
the male (Lev. 15). Even her monetary value was less (Lev. 27:1-7).
If traditional interpretations have neglected female imagery for God,
they have also neglected females, Similarly, the sacrifice of the
daughter of Jephthah documents the powerlessness and abuse of a child
in the days of the judges (Judg. 11). No interpretation can save her
from the holocaust or mitigate the foolish vow of her father. But we
can move through the indictment of the father to claim sisterhood with
the daughter. Retelling her story, we emphasize the daughters of
Israel to whom she reaches out in the last days of her life (Judg.
11:37). Thus, we underscore the postscript, discovering in the process
an alternative translation.Traditionally, the ending has read, "She
[the daughter] had never known man. And it became a custom in Israel
that the daughters of Israel went year by year to lament the daughter
of Jephthah the Gileadite four days in the year" (11:40). Since the
verb become, however, is a feminine form (Hebrew has no neuter),
another reading is likely: "Although she had never known a man,
nevertheless she became a tradition [custom] in Israel. From year to
year the
daughters of Israel went to mourn the daughter of Jephthah the
Gileadite, four days in the year." By virtue of this translation, we
can understand the ancient story in a new way. The unnamed virgin
child becomes a tradition in Israel because the women with whom she
chooses to spend her last days do not let her pass into oblivion; they
establish a living memorial. Interpreting such stories of terror on
behalf of women is surely, then, another way of challenging the
patriarchy of Scripture
Time and again Jesus demonstrated his respect for women as persons,
not possessions. In the Judean society of Jesus' day a man was not to
speak with a woman in public; sometimes even is she was a wife or
daughter, and never to converse with a Gentile woman. Nor was a man to
touch any woman other than his wife or daughter, however innocent the
purpose. Certainly a man was not to teach women. Nonetheless, Jesus
defied every one of these rules! The genealogy of Jesus as reported in
Matthew is remarkable because it includes references to several female
ancestors, something not done in Jewish genealogies at the time. Not
only are five women mentioned, but all of these women are associated
with some form of less then ideal sexual behavior. Jesus, for his time
and place, was notably unsexist. In Samaria, when he talked with the
woman at the well—this is the longest personal exchange he has with
anyone in the Bible—his disciples “marveled”; a Jewish man did not, in
public, speak to a woman unrelated to him. In another episode, in
Luke, Jesus is dining with Simon the Pharisee when a “woman in the
city,” a “sinner”enters the house, washes Jesus’ feet with her tears,
dries them with her hair, kisses them, and then anoints them with balm
from a jar. Simon says to Christ that if he can accept that tribute
from such a person then he is surely not a prophet. Christ answers
that the “sinner” has shown him more love than Simon has.
Some people denounce biblical faith as hopelessly misogynous,
although this judgment usually fails to evaluate the evidence in terms
of Israelite culture. Some reprehensibly use these data to support
anti-Semitic sentiments. Some read the Bible as a historical document
devoid of any continuing authority and hence worthy of dismissal. The
"Who cares?" question often comes at this point. Others succumb to
despair about the ever-present male power that the Bible and its
commentators hold over women. And still others, unwilling to let the
case against women be the determining word, insist that text and
interpreters provide more excellent ways. Discerning within Scripture
a critique of patriarchy, certain feminists concentrate upon
discovering and recovering traditions that challenge the culture. This
task involves highlighting neglected texts and reinterpreting familiar
ones.
Prominent among neglected passages are portrayals of deity as female.
A psalmist declares that God is midwife (Ps. 22:9-10):
Yet thou art the one who took me from the womb; thou didst keep me
safe upon my mother's breast.
In turn, God becomes mother, the one upon whom the child is cast from
birth: Upon thee was I cast from my birth,and since my mother bore me
thou hast been my God. Although this poem stops short of an exact
equation, in it female
imagery mirrors divine activity. What the psalmist suggests,
Deuteronomy 32:18 makes explicit: You were unmindful of the Rock that
begot you and you forgot the God who gave you birth. Though the RSV
translates accurately "the God who gave you birth," the rendering is
tame. We need to accent the striking portrayal of God as a woman
in labor pains, for the Hebrew verb has exclusively this meaning. (How
scandalous, then, is the totally incorrect translation in the
Jerusalem Bible, "You forgot the God who fathered you."). Yet another
instance of female imagery is the metaphor of the womb as given in the
Hebrew radicals rhm. In its singular form the word denotes the
physical organ unique to the female. In the plural, it connotes the
compassion of both human beings and God. God the merciful (rahum) is
God the mother. (See, e.g., Jer. 31:15-22.)
Over centuries, however, translators and commentators have ignored
such female imagery, with disastrous results for God, man and woman.
To reclaim the image of God female is to become aware of the male
idolatry that has long infested faith.
What is the Christian view on a woman's conduct or place? Is it what
the Pope says it is? Is it what Billy Graham says it is? Is it what Al
Sharpton says it is? Or Jerry Falwell or James Kennedy or Robert
Schuler? You see when we pose the issue this way, we discover that
there is no consensus, and when the various defenders of Christianity
discover that, when each defines what he or she believes Christianity
to be, there is no consensus. There are some who believe that the way
is only found in the New Testament. There are those who believe the
same of the Old. Some hold that if the New has no word on a particular
subject then the word of the Old stands. Still other believe that
where the Old and New conflict, the New supercedes the Old. This is
just a few of the variations. You know what, all of them are each
convinced that their way is the 'right' one. If you add to that the
fact that the Bible is composed of various writings of people from all
walks of life and from all points of view, you soon realize that it is
not strictly a literal account, but the interpretation of the facts by
the individual writers. Lets look at the way Jesus spent his time here
and the values he lived his life by. He spent time with sinners. He
was kind, understanding, gentle, forgiving in most cases. The few
things he did get angry about were issues that still hold true today.
He was tolerant of those who did not follow his way, and his love was
not in any way conditional on belief in him. He tried to better the
lot of those he touched, irrespective of their belief. He never made
conversion a condition of healing - he simply did his mission and let
others come to him if they felt him in their hearts by their own free
will. I believe that a true Christian would try and emulate the values
of his Saviour.
The New Testament Gospels, written toward the last quarter of the
first century CE, acknowledge that women were among Jesus' earliest
followers. From the beginning, Jewish women disciples, including Mary
Magdalene, Joanna, and Susanna, had accompanied Jesus during his
ministry and supported him out of their private means (Luke 8:1-3). He
spoke to women both in public and private. Certainly he learned his
mother's wisdom, and according to the Gospel story, an unnamed Gentile
woman persuaded Jesus to declare that the ministry of God is not
limited to particular groups and persons, but belongs to all who have
faith (Mark 7:24-30; Matthew 15:21-28). Jesus was a frequent visitor
at the home of Mary and Martha, and was in the habit of teaching and
eating meals with women as well as men. When Jesus was arrested, women
remained firm, even when his male disciples fled, and women
accompanied him to the foot of the cross. It was women who were
reported as the first witnesses to the resurrection, chief among them,
Mary Magdalene. It is certain that God created Man and Woman as
companions and equals from the beginning; Yet, two thousand years
after the birth of Christ the Southern Baptist Convention voted to add
a clause to the denomination's statement of beliefs affirming that a
wife is to submit herself to the leadership of her husband; and the
Vatican warned that those Catholics who continue to argue in favor of
woman's ordination would be subject to penalty. Why is this so? What
does the Bible say about the roles of men and women?
Does the Bible in fact say that God cares equally for men and women
and that they have equal responsibilities under Christ's authority;
And 'that it is all worth nothing without love'?
I Corinthians 13:1-13
The road we travel will take us into the battle to restore
beauty in all things;
And it will also take us home..
Questions that are answered--
Is there proof that Holy Spirit is female?
Is there any evidence that Jesus married Mary Magdalene?
What are The Gospel of Philip and The Gospel of Mary Magdalene?
Does the holy name of God, YHWH, imply a union between a masculine and
a feminine deity?
How do we know what the earliest Christians really believed about
Jesus Christ?